Skip to main content
news

Re: Snit digest 165 / 2015-...

Snit
Google Google
SubjectRe: Snit digest 165 / 2015-12-19
FromSnit
Date12/19/2015 18:36 (12/19/2015 10:36)
Message-ID<D29AE3A0.67730%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.os.linux.advocacy
FollowsSandman
On 12/19/15, 3:18 AM, in article sandman-c7879315f5222aaa46162122df272247@individual.net, "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote:

Snit
Comes down to you have an image to "back" your words, and your words to "back" your image...

Sandman
Not at all. I knew you wife's name before this comment of hers was made public, but that's about it. I have no need to find anything out about your private life.

And ironically, had you not lied about it this time, I wouldn't have made the effort to expose your lie and thus learn more about your private life.

Your lies have made your wife's personal life more exposed on USENET than it had had you not lied.

Again, had you been honest and honorable, your first response to this thread would have been "So what?" and that's it, nothing more would have happened. You wouldn't have had a need to remove your wife's comment, no need to deny the onslaught of evidence you lied, no need for this "argument" at all.

You chose this, which is a pity.

Already responded to Sandman and Carroll's circus... the only question now is how long they will obsess over it and how far they will push it: ----- If the comment really was removed then this is evidence damning Carroll and Sandman. The idea one of them would remove a falsified post KNOWING about this idiotic circus of their is MUCH greater than someone who is not even a part of their circus happening to remove it right as they push a circus and troll over it.

Also damning against the two of them is how Sandman repeatedly snips the counter to his claimed "evidence" and pushes a circus of just repeating his refuted crap.

His whole "evidence" is that he has an easily forged image to "back" his words, and unsuported words to "back" his image, while admitting he already knew my wife's name and thus could easily have found her account to copy it (he even let on he had been doing a search which would be done to do such a thing).

The most likely explanation: Carroll and Sandman - knowing they have again backed themselves in a corner with their lies - are pushing an idiotic circus where they forged a Facebook account and blamed me. It is the type thing they have done in the past where they plant information for themselves or their socks and co-trolls to "find".

And Sandman, on seeing this, breaks his word AGAIN by altering subject lines and modifying the text he quotes. If he was not lying about this whole circus of his he would have no reason to do so. He is pushing tons of obfuscation around his own nonsense.

If he was not lying he would just be straightforward. He is not. All evidence points to he and Carroll lying and forging data again. ------

-- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>