Google| Subject | Re: Calumet files Chapter 7 |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 04/04/2014 15:09 (04/04/2014 15:09) |
| Message-ID | <slrnljtbrl.6ee.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Tony Cooper |
| Followups | Tony Cooper (2h & 2m) > Sandman Eric Stevens (13h & 35m) > Sandman |
In article <jiasj9p57r7jqiqci42h8lbkviopu1kvf0@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper wrote:
Only to "use with" Photoshop:nospamTony Cooper
once again, there is no approval necessary to write and sell a photoshop plug-in and call it that, which is what a lot of companies do.
To paraphrase one of your favorite terms: no one has said that any approval is required to write a plug-in to used with an Adobe product.
Tony Cooper 03/15/2014 03:13:30 PM <hgn8i9pp0requhve7bt09eubvstel0ig44@4ax.com>
"they can approve vendors as suppliers of plugins for Photoshop. The plugins on that page are evidently plugins that Adobe has approved for use with Photoshop."
Only - you have never been able to provide any support for the approval process from Adobe for plugins to be "used with" Photoshop.
You pointed to a process wherein Adobe approves to include the plug-in on their market place (titled "Photoshop Plug-ins" while none are authored by Adobe), but that failed to provide support for the claim that they approve the plugins "for use with Photoshop".
-- Sandman[.net]
03/13/2014-
-
