Google| Subject | Re: Calumet files Chapter 7 |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 03/28/2014 19:51 (03/28/2014 19:51) |
| Message-ID | <slrnljbh93.bcc.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Tony Cooper |
| Followups | Tony Cooper (26m) > Sandman Eric Stevens (6d, 6h & 32m) > Sandman |
In article <se7bj9p77aidivke03reivp1hvpbi48kd9@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper wrote:
1. I've never used it in relation to a "few" substantiations. 2. You have never been able to cope with any substantiation.Tony CooperSandman
For example, a while back you said you provided an "onslaught" of substantiation about something or other. I accept "onslaught" as a word, and it's in the dictionary, but not with the meaning you seemed to have in mind.
Yes, I know you're ignorant about the word "onslaught".onslaught noun - a fierce or destructive attack: a series of onslaughts on the citadel. - a large quantity of people or things that is difficult to cope withNote, particularly, example number 2.Tony Cooper
If you found that definition, and still feel that "onslaught" is the right word choice to describe a few cites of supposed "substantiation", then your case is more hopeless than I first thought.
You're welcome.
And to get back to the topic you're frantically trying to ignore:
When are we going to see substantiation from you with regards to this claim from you:
Tony Cooper 03/25/2014 <7c33j91hnrsri9jor58stsqj03p65u2ale@4ax.com>
"What he ignores is that in *all* purchases online, there is no sales help available."
Certainly no onslaught there! More like a complete drought in terms of substantiations!
Now snip it away and run away again, little Tony.
-- Sandman[.net]
03/13/2014-
-
