Subject | Re: Calumet files Chapter 7 |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 04/03/2014 23:57 (04/04/2014 10:57) |
Message-ID | <i7mrj9dj90952gn7ghfeersihq0t2254d9@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | nospam |
Followups | nospam (1h & 21m) |
nospamAnd what people wanted was the lowest price.
In article <250320141718178318%not@aol.com>, Scott Schuckert <not@aol.com>wrote:nospamSandmanScott Schuckert
So, the actual price of the product is just one parameter of many when you decide how "competitive" a retail vendor is.
Well, you certainly SEEMED to make it about price. When I had my stores, I offered all the amenities I mentioned before, and like to think I did a good job at them. I still lost customers to mail order, over price differences of 10% or less.
you weren't offering what people wanted.
... or they got it for nothing - and then went off and found the lowest price. --Scott Schuckertnospam
So I ask again, in two ways: On price, how close is close enough; on services, what more do customers need to justify a price difference of, say, 15% or 20%, my additional operating costs over the mail order guys?
I already know the answer - customers won't pay for services. But convince me...
some do, some don't.
in your case, not enough did or they didn't consider what you offered to be all that useful to them.