Google| Subject | Re: Calumet files Chapter 7 |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 04/04/2014 07:40 (04/04/2014 07:40) |
| Message-ID | <slrnljshi3.51j.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
| Followups | Tony Cooper (9h & 13m) PeterN (17h & 53m) > Sandman Eric Stevens (20h & 39m) > Sandman |
In article <i3vrj9dpe0eu24om4e9ocklmtqbhifik71@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:
Eric Stevens
--- snip ---
Tony CooperSandman
If a subject is addressed, and an aspect of that subject is not included, that aspect can be said to be "ignored".
No, this is incorrect. It could be any of these:1. Forgotten 2. Overlooked 3. Ignored 4. MissedEric Stevens
I would address the point in only a slightly different way.
It could be any one of these:
1. Forgotten 2. Overlooked 3. Deliberately ignored. 4. Missed.
In any case, If a subject is addressed, and an aspect of that subject is not included, that aspect can be said to be "ignored". As the list indicates, that does not require that the aspect has been deliberately ignored.ignore verb refuse to take notice of or acknowledge; disregard intentionally
-- Sandman[.net]
03/13/2014-
-
