Subject | Re: Calumet files Chapter 7 |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 04/05/2014 04:45 (04/05/2014 15:45) |
Message-ID | <gdquj9dtitklh6qoft392dnkvgv3pjk9fa@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | nospam (46m) > Eric Stevens Sandman (6h & 46m) |
SandmanSee https://www.adobeexchange.com/producer
In article <jiasj9p57r7jqiqci42h8lbkviopu1kvf0@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper wrote:SandmannospamTony Cooper
once again, there is no approval necessary to write and sell a photoshop plug-in and call it that, which is what a lot of companies do.
To paraphrase one of your favorite terms: no one has said that any approval is required to write a plug-in to used with an Adobe product.
Only to "use with" Photoshop:
Tony Cooper 03/15/2014 03:13:30 PM <hgn8i9pp0requhve7bt09eubvstel0ig44@4ax.com>
"they can approve vendors as suppliers of plugins for Photoshop. The plugins on that page are evidently plugins that Adobe has approved for use with Photoshop."
Only - you have never been able to provide any support for the approval process from Adobe for plugins to be "used with" Photoshop.
You pointed to a process wherein Adobe approves to include the plug-in on their market place (titled "Photoshop Plug-ins" while none are authored by Adobe), but that failed to provide support for the claim that they approve the plugins "for use with Photoshop".I think the process begins here http://www.adobe.com/misc/terms.html and the information you are after may be downstream of section 9.5 --