Google| Subject | Re: Calumet files Chapter 7 |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 04/04/2014 07:39 (04/04/2014 07:39) |
| Message-ID | <slrnljshfl.51j.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
| Followups | Tony Cooper (9h & 30m) > Sandman Eric Stevens (21h & 25m) > Sandman |
In article <2ntrj9t0jka72jnt8fqvgtu0n84tl4umje@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:
No, not that I'm aware of. Tony incorrectly thought I had used the word "onslaught" inappropriately, but failed to show how, and I have since substantiated that I was using it correctly - which is when he quietly left the thread to lick his wounds.Eric StevensSandmanPeterNSavageduckSandman
Perhaps a virtual inundation of substantiations was meant to imply a metaphoric onslaught. ...maybe a flood, or even a plethora of substantiations might end up described so?
Or maybe just a large quantity of substantiations that Tony has had a hard time coping with? I.e. what actually has happened everytime I've used the word.
Only the times when you use an inappropriate word.
You are free to point to any such time, Peter. Be my guest. I am happy to be corrected when I make mistakes. Be sure to point to the post of my inappropiate usage and substantiation for how and why it was inappropriate.
Isn't that what the present argument is about?
-- Sandman[.net]
03/13/2014-
-
