Subject | Re: Calumet files Chapter 7 |
From | Tony Cooper |
Date | 04/05/2014 00:01 (04/04/2014 18:01) |
Message-ID | <lv7uj9hu3h1tes35dk3vjbblr9nklq8do7@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (11h & 13m) > Tony Cooper |
I'm going to snip the rest of your reply because I see no reason for a point-by-point reply to a series of bogus rebuttals. You are one of those people without the intellectual capacity to meet concepts heretofore unknown to you and process them simply as new information. You approach them from the position that if you don't already know about them, they must be wrong.SandmanTony CooperTony CooperSandman
What, then, do you think "perceives" means? A perceived need is simply a need we think we have, and that equates to a want; we want it because we think we need it.
Man, you've totally lost it. We do not *want* things because we *think* we need them. We don't *want* things because we *need* them either. If we're lucky, we may very well want the smae things that are also needed, but the words are not synonymous.
You are so far off track here that there's no possibility at all of getting you to understand. Perceived needs and perceived values have been established terms almost forever. Well, "forever" in the history of studying human behavior. I was reading case studies on this when I getting my MBA from Northwestern University.
I am not claiming the term doesn't exist, I am correctly pointing out that "perceived need" has nothing to do with "want".