Subject | Re: Calumet files Chapter 7 |
From | Sandman |
Date | 03/31/2014 17:04 (03/31/2014 17:04) |
Message-ID | <slrnljj13f.pd1.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Tony Cooper |
Followups | Tony Cooper (1h & 5m) > Sandman Neil Ellwood (21h & 51m) > Sandman |
I actually missed that, I thought it was "none" you were in reference to, which sort of speaks to how low your credibility with regards to English is and how any comment you make about it will be doubted until you give anything substantial.Tony CooperSandmanTony CooperSandmanSandman
You are free to point to any such time, Peter. Be my guest. I am happy to be corrected when I make mistakes. Be sure to point to the post of my inappropiate usage and substantiation for how and why it was inappropriate.I'm waiting.PeterN
Just look at and read any of your postings in which Tony orI corrected your English.
There is none to look at that meet that criteria.
Here's one for you, then. "There is none..." is a gross error.
"gross", huh? I'm way past at taking you at face value, so you need more than just a claim here, Andreas.
What? You need some "substantiation" that it should be "There are none..."?
-- Sandman[.net]If I adopted your juvenile style of writing, I'd add "Hilarious", "haha", or "Ironic".Sandman
Poor Andreas.