Subject | Re: Calumet files Chapter 7 |
From | PeterN |
Date | 03/30/2014 00:32 (03/29/2014 19:32) |
Message-ID | <lh7l5c02rrv@news3.newsguy.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Tony Cooper (1h & 54m) Sandman (8h & 17m) > PeterN |
SandmanJust look at and read any of your postings in which Tony orI corrected your English. And that's as far as I go with you English lesson.
In article <lh50in1182m@news3.newsguy.com>, PeterN wrote:SandmanPeterNSavageduckSandman
Perhaps a virtual inundation of substantiations was meant to imply a metaphoric onslaught. ...maybe a flood, or even a plethora of substantiations might end up described so?
Or maybe just a large quantity of substantiations that Tony has had a hard time coping with? I.e. what actually has happened everytime I've used the word.
Only the times when you use an inappropriate word.
You are free to point to any such time, Peter. Be my guest. I am happy to be corrected when I make mistakes. Be sure to point to the post of my inappropiate usage and substantiation for how and why it was inappropriate.
I'm waiting.