Skip to main content
news

Re: Calumet files Chapter 7

PeterN
SubjectRe: Calumet files Chapter 7
FromPeterN
Date03/26/2014 00:21 (03/25/2014 19:21)
Message-ID<lgt30u02q5i@news3.newsguy.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
FollowsPAS
FollowupsPAS (13h & 43m) > PeterN

On 3/25/2014 9:36 AM, PAS wrote:

PAS
"PeterN" <peter.newnospam@verizon.net>wrote in message

PeterN
On 3/24/2014 10:33 AM, PAS wrote:

<snip>

PAS
The U.S. Constitution does not give any authority to the federal government to compete with private business. The founders were distrustful of government, and rightly so. The Constitution is designed to LIMIT the power of the federal government.

PeterN
You got it backwards. the Constitution is designed to grant certain limited powers to the Federal government.

We need go no further than the "savings clause." the Tenth amendment makes it clear that the federal government has only only the enumerated powers.

PAS
Perhaps it's a matter of semantics but enumerating limited powers to the federal government IS limiting their power which is what the Constitution does. The 10th Amendment does indicate that the federal government is limited to the powers granted to it by the Constitution. "The powers not delegated to the United Stated by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people." To me, this makes it crystal clear the federal government has, for quite a long time, acted unconstitutionally and continues to. The bailouts, the ACA, and a whole host of others are unconstitutional.

the Constitution is not to be read literally. e.g. Freedom of speech does not give anyone ot yell "fire" in a crowded theater. Freedom of religion does not give the right to use illegal drugs, or commit bigamy, etc.

The bailout is legal under the Commerce clause. If you fell the government has actd illegally, you have a right to bring an action to stop the action, provided you are harmed by it.

-- PeterN

PAS (13h & 43m) > PeterN