Subject | Re: Calumet files Chapter 7 |
From | nospam |
Date | 04/04/2014 03:17 (04/03/2014 21:17) |
Message-ID | <030420142117558677%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
Followups | Tony Cooper (2h & 40m) > nospam Eric Stevens (3h & 25m) > nospam |
once again, there is no approval necessary to write and sell a photoshop plug-in and call it that, which is what a lot of companies do.SandmanEric Stevens
Haha, best joke of the day, Mr Clown Dictionary. You still don't know the meaning of words such as "protocol", "requirement" or what a "Photoshop Plug-In" is. Remember such fantastic quotes such as:
Tony Cooper 03/17/2014 01:29:18 PM <81qdi9p509anhalqskqa7cqu8d57g8412o@4ax.com>
'Only Adobe can call a plug-in a "Photoshop Plug-in"'
And quite right too. Once Adobe has called it that, so too can other people. If you haven't got Adobe's approval, the proper way to describe it is as a 'plug-in for Photoshop'.