Subject | Re: Calumet files Chapter 7 |
From | Sandman |
Date | 04/04/2014 17:28 (04/04/2014 17:28) |
Message-ID | <slrnljtk0j.6jc.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Tony Cooper |
As opposed to "for use with Photoshop", which was your explicit and incorrect claim.SandmannospamTony Cooper
once again, there is no approval necessary to write and sell a photoshop plug-in and call it that, which is what a lot of companies do.
To paraphrase one of your favorite terms: no one has said that any approval is required to write a plug-in to used with an Adobe product.
Only to "use with" Photoshop:Tony Cooper 03/15/2014 03:13:30 PM <hgn8i9pp0requhve7bt09eubvstel0ig44@4ax.com>"they can approve vendors as suppliers of plugins for Photoshop. The plugins on that page are evidently plugins that Adobe has approved for use with Photoshop."Only - you have never been able to provide any support for the approval process from Adobe for plugins to be "used with" Photoshop.You pointed to a process wherein Adobe approves to include the plug-in on their market place (titled "Photoshop Plug-ins" while none are authored by Adobe), but that failed to provide support for the claim that they approve the plugins "for use with Photoshop".Tony Cooper
I offer expert testimony: nospam, your midget tag team buddy. He's posted several times that Adobe has approved certain plug-ins for the "showcase".