Skip to main content
news

Re: Calumet files Chapter 7

Sandman
SubjectRe: Calumet files Chapter 7
FromSandman
Date04/04/2014 17:28 (04/04/2014 17:28)
Message-ID<slrnljtk0j.6jc.mr@irc.sandman.net>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
FollowsTony Cooper

In article <lditj9hpargv32kq8j3fsrtd6degm5478h@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper wrote:

nospam
once again, there is no approval necessary to write and sell a photoshop plug-in and call it that, which is what a lot of companies do.

Tony Cooper
To paraphrase one of your favorite terms: no one has said that any approval is required to write a plug-in to used with an Adobe product.

Sandman
Only to "use with" Photoshop:

Tony Cooper 03/15/2014 03:13:30 PM <hgn8i9pp0requhve7bt09eubvstel0ig44@4ax.com>

"they can approve vendors as suppliers of plugins for Photoshop. The plugins on that page are evidently plugins that Adobe has approved for use with Photoshop."

Only - you have never been able to provide any support for the approval process from Adobe for plugins to be "used with" Photoshop.

You pointed to a process wherein Adobe approves to include the plug-in on their market place (titled "Photoshop Plug-ins" while none are authored by Adobe), but that failed to provide support for the claim that they approve the plugins "for use with Photoshop".

Tony Cooper
I offer expert testimony: nospam, your midget tag team buddy. He's posted several times that Adobe has approved certain plug-ins for the "showcase".

As opposed to "for use with Photoshop", which was your explicit and incorrect claim.

Case closed? You made a mistake and you're now admitting to it? Would be the first time. Does he dare or will he just ignore this post? Nah, he may snip some embarrassing parts of it though.

-- Sandman[.net]