Google| Subject | Re: Calumet files Chapter 7 |
| From | Tony Cooper |
| Date | 03/30/2014 14:26 (03/30/2014 08:26) |
| Message-ID | <e73gj91jgvulphrraqbtto55va3nnauos5@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (16h & 55m) > Tony Cooper Eric Stevens (4d, 12h & 26m) |
On 30 Mar 2014 07:49:42 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:
SandmanHere's one for you, then. "There is none..." is a gross error.
In article <lh7l5c02rrv@news3.newsguy.com>, PeterN wrote:SandmanSandmanPeterNSavageduckSandman
Perhaps a virtual inundation of substantiations was meant to imply a metaphoric onslaught. ...maybe a flood, or even a plethora of substantiations might end up described so?
Or maybe just a large quantity of substantiations that Tony has had a hard time coping with? I.e. what actually has happened everytime I've used the word.
Only the times when you use an inappropriate word.
You are free to point to any such time, Peter. Be my guest. I am happy to be corrected when I make mistakes. Be sure to point to the post of my inappropiate usage and substantiation for how and why it was inappropriate.I'm waiting.PeterN
Just look at and read any of your postings in which Tony orI corrected your English.
There is none to look at that meet that criteria.
If I adopted your juvenile style of writing, I'd add "Hilarious", "haha", or "Ironic".
-- Tony Cooper - Orlando FLPeterNSandman
And that's as far as I go with you English lesson.
So, you have nothing. I knew that of course.
03/13/2014-
-
