Subject | Re: Calumet files Chapter 7 |
From | Sandman |
Date | 04/05/2014 18:09 (04/05/2014 18:09) |
Message-ID | <slrnlk0apb.aej.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Tony Cooper |
Andreas said - working as Eric's spokesperson. Don't you think Eric has brains enough to answer for himself?Tony CooperSandmanTony CooperEric StevensSandman
There is a lot more competition when you are subjected to an onslaught of choices from a plethora of competing products.
Oooh, interesting. "onslaught" ey? May I be so bold as to ask what you mean by "onslaught" here? Just so you're prepared when Tony will question your usage of the word. :)
Evidently "satirical reference" is another concept Popinjay does not grok.
It seems Andreas is busy ascribing motives to another poster yet again. While it may be true that it was a humorous reference, it doesn't change the fact that you are known to question correctly used instances of the word in question - so either Eric used the word incorrect and thus you have no problem with it, or he used it correctly and you should object loudly (and for weeks, if not months).
Eric was poking fun at your usage.
You may just be catching on that it was intended as a humorous reference, but we're all not that slow.You may not have caught on that in response I used the humor (if intended) to poke fun at you.
I have not made fun of "instances" of inappropriate use of the word in question. There has been just the one clanger, not a plural of uses. That's rather the point: no one else would use it that way....illiterate Andreas says, without any support.