Subject | Re: Calumet files Chapter 7 |
From | nospam |
Date | 04/05/2014 06:14 (04/05/2014 00:14) |
Message-ID | <050420140014419233%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Tony Cooper |
do try to keep up.Tony CoopernospamSandmanEric Stevens
"they can approve vendors as suppliers of plugins for Photoshop. The plugins on that page are evidently plugins that Adobe has approved for use with Photoshop."
Only - you have never been able to provide any support for the approval process from Adobe for plugins to be "used with" Photoshop.
See https://www.adobeexchange.com/producerSandmanEric Stevens
You pointed to a process wherein Adobe approves to include the plug-in on their market place (titled "Photoshop Plug-ins" while none are authored by Adobe), but that failed to provide support for the claim that they approve the plugins "for use with Photoshop".
I think the process begins here http://www.adobe.com/misc/terms.html and the information you are after may be downstream of section 9.5
it doesn't.
all you need to do is download the photoshop sdk, write whatever plug-in you want and offer it for sale. adobe doesn't even have to know about it.
I don't know why you keep repeating this point. No one is contesting it. We all know that anyone can write a plug-in for Photoshop or LR and make that plug-in available to anyone without Adobe's knowledge or consent.
What is at question is only what you should call it.