Subject | Re: Calumet files Chapter 7 |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 04/05/2014 02:16 (04/05/2014 13:16) |
Message-ID | <cliuj9d7j85a6n81tqtpqo6v0oo5ugi2sl@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | PeterN |
Followups | PeterN (8d, 2h & 24m) |
PeterNMore the latter, especially when the non-native arrives heavily armed with the intention of slaughtering you and your fellow inhabitants to enable him to take over your land.
On 4/3/2014 5:32 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:Eric StevensPeterN
On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 18:09:48 -0400, PeterN <peter.newnospam@verizon.net>wrote:Eric StevensPASPeterN
As much as something may benefit us, if the federal government has no Constitutional authority to do it, then they simply should not do it.
Yup! Except that there is clear Constitutional authority. Indeed the prime reason for a government is to provide for the welfare of the people.
The prime reason for a government is to defend the realm.
All else is icing on the cake.
Defending against what?
Illness. Natural disasters Economic issues. thieves and scoundrels,
Or is it only to fight when someone, not a native dares to step on the sacred soil.