Subject | Re: Calumet files Chapter 7 |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 04/04/2014 02:32 (04/04/2014 13:32) |
Message-ID | <i3vrj9dpe0eu24om4e9ocklmtqbhifik71@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (5h & 8m) > Eric Stevens |
I would address the point in only a slightly different way.Tony CooperSandman
If a subject is addressed, and an aspect of that subject is not included, that aspect can be said to be "ignored".
No, this is incorrect. It could be any of these:
1. Forgotten 2. Overlooked 3. Ignored 4. Missed