Google| Subject | Re: Calumet files Chapter 7 |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 03/29/2014 18:17 (03/29/2014 18:17) |
| Message-ID | <slrnlje04m.fhc.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | PeterN |
| Followups | PeterN (6h & 14m) > Sandman Eric Stevens (5d, 6h & 46m) > Sandman |
In article <lh50in1182m@news3.newsguy.com>, PeterN wrote:
You are free to point to any such time, Peter. Be my guest. I am happy to be corrected when I make mistakes. Be sure to point to the post of my inappropiate usage and substantiation for how and why it was inappropriate.PeterNSavageduckSandman
Perhaps a virtual inundation of substantiations was meant to imply a metaphoric onslaught. ...maybe a flood, or even a plethora of substantiations might end up described so?
Or maybe just a large quantity of substantiations that Tony has had a hard time coping with? I.e. what actually has happened everytime I've used the word.
Only the times when you use an inappropriate word.
I'm waiting.
-- Sandman[.net]
03/13/2014-
-
