Sandman
In article <01kg99d1m6o4ovh1oesjhqq2m9nr2nlslj@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:

Eric Stevens
Perhaps I should have put more effort into it but it never occurred to me that neither you nor nospam would understand what was being said.

Sandman
And an ad hominem to boot - you sure now how to troll, Eric. Reasonable debate and factual posts - not so much.

Eric Stevens
I think you understand what I and Tony are trying to say very well.

Sandman
You guys are trying to enforce your viewpoint with the use of classic troll methods, many which I have pointed out to you.

An no - many times I can't understand what it is you guys are trying to say. Tony, for instance, have been contradicting himself a lot in this thread, mainly due to the fact that he is trying to apply a word ("protocol") to something he doesn't understand (software developing)

Eric Stevens
All you are doing is jerking us around in a misguided attempt to show how clever you are.

Sandman
Haha, I am jerking you around? Tell me, Eric - in what way did I jerk you around when you joined this thread and posted this unsubstantiated claim:

Eric Stevens Re: Paintshop and Corel 11/28/2013 <s14d99tpigvh1jt1g2idvq17u7j8h16t9q@4ax.com>

"The problem in this case is that neither of you properly understand the meaning of 'protocol'."

How on *earth* can you claim that *I* am jerking *YOU* around here? You are the one who jumped in to the thread and posted an unsubstantiated accusation - something that *still* remains unsubstantiated! That's a *classic* troll move!

You see - I *also* jumped in to this thread, but I did it to question Tony's condescending trolling, not to troll Tony or "jerk" him around. My post contained my interpretation of Tony's post and a desire to expose his very childish attitude towards nospam.