Subject | Re: Paintshop and Corel |
From | Tony Cooper |
Date | 11/27/2013 01:27 (11/26/2013 19:27) |
Message-ID | <kgea995ja52vl2l6ivdm3oc07ldu5vij41@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Savageduck |
Followups | Savageduck (1h & 13m) |
SavageduckThat definition I already know about. That type of "policy" is what any business might have, and that includes a business that doesn't have a computer, let alone an IT person.
On 2013-11-26 20:51:19 +0000, Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com>said:Tony CooperSavageduck
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:54:57 -0500, "J. Clarke" <jclarkeusenet@cox.net>wrote:J. ClarkeTony Cooper
Tony, just a comment here but someone working in IT would typically use "policy" to describe what you are referring to as a "protocol", which could be part the reason that people are being so argumentative.
I don't know that usage. I'm not involved in IT in any way, so if there's a jargon use for "policy", then it's new to me.
I'd appreciate a definition of "policy" as it applies to IT work. Preferably, a definition in your own words rather than a link. Link definitions tend to contain references that need definitions.
To me, a "policy" would be a set of regulations that determine how a situation will be handled. A "protocol", though, is a set of steps that will be followed in performing a task. A policy determines what people do, but the protocol determines what a program does.
Correct me if I'm wrong about a policy in an IT context.
A corporate policy when it comes to IT could be anything from "No Apple computers permitted on our network", to "mandatory back-up of current work prior to log off", or restrictions on installing and running non-IT approved software on corporate machines. A company might have a policy requiring mandatory backup, but a protocol has to be executed to implement that policy.