Google| Subject | Re: Paintshop and Corel |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 11/26/2013 07:41 (11/26/2013 07:41) |
| Message-ID | <slrnl98glr.u9i.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Tony Cooper |
In article <cka799db7rb863hrv3h4u79rgp7kopv0kt@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper wrote:
Tony lying again. Where did nospam ever claim it was an invalid and non-descriptive term, troll boy?PeterNTony Cooper
Sandman very well understands what a protocol is. He is just using an excuse to troll and you bit. OTOH nospam is simply truing to wiggle out of his misstatement. Drop the discussion, there's so many more interesting things.
You gotta admit it's kinda funny. We have a guy with alleged technical experience and knowledge of technical "jargon" terms attempting to deny that "backup protocol" is a valid and descriptive term because he's never heard it used.
And, we have another guy who brags about his expertise who thinks a "backup protocol" is only a mental plan and something that is done manually.Lie #2, that's all you've got, Tony.
They both are trying to tell us that an "automatic" function is some kind of magic that the device comes up with on its own and not the result of a protocol included in the program.Lie #3, or are your reading comprehension just this bad?
Both are trying to tell us that an "automatic" function not dependant on the program's protocols because the user thinks it's done automatically.Lie #4
Dirt is flying all over the place from the two of them madly digging the hole deeper and deeper.Ironic.
In fact, you'd be hard pressed to quote us *disagreeing* with your use of "protocol" other than to say that it was an unusual term to be used for somrthing that is done automatic.
But hey, don't let facts and reality stop you, you're on a lying streak!
-- Sandman[.net]
11/16/2013-
