Subject | Re: Paintshop and Corel |
From | J. Clarke |
Date | 11/26/2013 23:29 (11/26/2013 17:29) |
Message-ID | <MPG.2cfeeaa5a9edf5b798a1c8@news.newsguy.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Tony Cooper |
Followups | Tony Cooper (5h & 41m) |
Tony CooperGenerally speaking a "protocol" would be something used for interprocess communications--TCP/IP for example is "Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol", a standard for communication between diverse systems. USENET runs on "NNTP"--Network News Transmission Protocol, another system-independent standard for communications. Whenever I think of a "protocol" that's the sort of thing I have in mind. There might be hardware aspects of it as well--"Ethernet" is a set of protocols that include definition of the voltages, currents, waveforms, etc for signals carried on cables or over fiber optic networks.
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:54:57 -0500, "J. Clarke" <jclarkeusenet@cox.net>wrote:J. ClarkeTony Cooper
Tony, just a comment here but someone working in IT would typically use "policy" to describe what you are referring to as a "protocol", which could be part the reason that people are being so argumentative.
I don't know that usage. I'm not involved in IT in any way, so if there's a jargon use for "policy", then it's new to me.
I'd appreciate a definition of "policy" as it applies to IT work. Preferably, a definition in your own words rather than a link. Link definitions tend to contain references that need definitions.
To me, a "policy" would be a set of regulations that determine how a situation will be handled. A "protocol", though, is a set of steps that will be followed in performing a task. A policy determines what people do, but the protocol determines what a program does.
Correct me if I'm wrong about a policy in an IT context.