Google| Subject | Re: Paintshop and Corel |
| From | Tony Cooper |
| Date | 12/05/2013 16:25 (12/05/2013 10:25) |
| Message-ID | <3i61a957mvkfgd9dv8tofbaansmttlc758@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (20m) |
On 5 Dec 2013 15:03:26 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:
SandmanThen why did you cite it in a post claiming that I didn't know what I was talking about?
In article <8q31a91t95t5fr4pn07k596onhqjfm0e4v@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com>wrote:SandmanTony Cooper Re: Paintshop and Corel 11/25/2013 <m3o699lcu5nkmjftqpss3pdj3bvv0mfkfg@4ax.com>Tony Cooper
"When the steps are determined by the developer, and written into the program, a protocol has been established so the action will always be the same. That's a protocol."
That's an undeniably correct statement.
Correct, I never claimed otherwise.
My reply to the above was me mocking you over the fact that you were stating the obvious.So, a correct statement from me is "stating the obvious" and subject to mocking? But, from you, a correct statement is "substantiation"?
-- Tony Cooper - Orlando FLTony Cooper
A protocol is established when the developer determines what will be done. The required code to perform the steps in the protocol the developer comes up with are then written into the program.
11/16/2013-
