Skip to main content
news

Re: Sandman still lying abo...

Sandman
SubjectRe: Sandman still lying about his CSS
FromSandman
Date02/16/2017 18:11 (02/16/2017 18:11)
Message-ID<sandman-5bc61b1f35cd509bf1056d3df0839c6d@individual.net>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.os.linux.advocacy
PGPSandman
FollowsSnit
FollowupsSnit (1h & 25m) > Sandman

In article <D4CB233B.9032A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:

Sandman
Not sure how many times I've asked now and you've ignored the question: Why? Why would I want to Skype with you?

Snit
Already answered: since it would bypass your primary trolling games which work in text you would never want to.

Your lying aside, what reason do I have to Skype with you? Why is it so hard for you to answer this?

Sandman
And I ask again - What accusations?

Snit
Any and all.

Sandman
And now I ask for the third time - *What accusations?*

Snit
I have answered repeatedly: your accusations where you obsess over me

Such as?

claiming I have forged PDFs

I have no "accusations" of you forging PDF's, I have fully substantiated claims that you forged PDF's. Stop trying to drag up arguments from the past.

accusing me of using names I have not

Which I have never done.

and on and on and on and on and on.

yet you can't point to a single one! Go figure.

But no matter how many times I answer your question you can snip it and otherwise play games and say I have not (see below for perfect examples). In text.

In a Skype session that would be harder -- hence the reason you will never Skype.

Why do you imagine that facts and logic is "harder" via Skype?

You have all sorts of accusations about me using socks,

Sandman
Nope, none of that. I have substantiated claims however. You know, those facts you fear so much.

Snit
Even if you claim to believe it you make the accusation (which also shows your obsession with me).

You need to look up the word "accusation". When you "accuse" someone for something, that is merely a claim. That's your style, you accuse people of things. I don't accuse, I claim and then I substantiate that claim. And as long as that substantiation is uncountered, it stands as full substantiation for the claim and as such is not a mere "accusation". Accusations are for people to feeble to provide substantiation. Like you.

all sorts of nonsense trolling.

Sandman
Yet none that you can point to.

Snit
I just noted it.

Nope, you just accused me for it, without providing any substantiation. Go figure.

Snit ignored the rest since he can't deal with reasoned discussion, or respond to any of the points I raise below, further feeding his snipping/ignoring statistics:

No, I do not care if you claim they are true.

Sandman
I don't care what you care about, so I don't even know why you are typing those letters in a post directed at me.

Snit
They are a testiment to your frustration and anger.

Sandman
I don't care if you claim that is true.

Snit
They are proof of your inability to stop trolling.

Sandman
I don't care if you claim that is true.

Snit
And since you cannot answer in text can we Skype?

Sandman
Funny, coming from the guy that have yet to answer my question above.

Snit
How about the accusations where you attribute the words of names other than "Snit" (me) to me.

Sandman
I only ever attribute posts to you on posts made by you.

Snit
See: text does not work for you.

Sandman
Works fine for me, don't know what problems you're having with it. have you tried turning it off and on again?

Snit
Yes or no: do you attribute the words of people other than "Snit" (me) to me? Simple question.

Sandman
Nope. I only ever attribute posts from you with your handle.

Snit
The answer is you do.

Sandman
Unsubstantiated claim

Snit
But you cannot admit it in text. So let's Skype.

Sandman
Why?

Snit
How about just stopping ALL that nonsense.

Sandman
What nonsense?

Snit
In text you are not able to understand.

Sandman
Understand what?

Snit
Let's Skype.

Sandman
Why?

Snit
On and on you go...

Sandman
Sounds like it's snipping time for Snit. Run away little boy, it's all you've got when I respond with a reasonable discussion. What you snipped:

Snit
I will remove the PDFs that show his CSS failing from my site.

Sandman
Why would I care about what you have on your site?

Snit
OK, if you do not care than I will leave them.

Sandman
You actually thought I gave a flying shit what you have on your site? That's hilarious.

Snit
I absolutely prefer if you would remove your attacks against me from your site

Sandman
What attacks?

Snit
and stop posting them to Usenet.

Sandman
Where did I do that?

Snit
In other words: if Sandman agrees to remove his lies (even if he does not admit they are lies)

Sandman
What supposed lies?

Snit
All of the "digests" and other nonsense.

Sandman
There are no "lies" in any of my digests, many of which aren't even about you.

Snit
Look at ANY of your pages dealing with me.

Sandman
What about them?

Snit
I will remove those PDFs from my site.

Sandman
I don't give a shit what PDF's you have on your site, Snit. What gave you the idea that I did? That's hilarious!

Snit
You have been trolling me over them for more than a decade.

Sandman
40+ threads about your CSS lie from you - 0 from me.

Snit
Not sure if I have any other examples of my "task" to get all the pages... so that task will have to be dropped, too (or I will have to update the software I used to make it). But so be it... I will drop that task if Sandman drops his trolling over his CSS.

Sandman
40+ threads about your CSS lies, 0 from me. I wonder who is going to "drop" it, ey? :-D

Snit
First: you focus on threads and not posts.

Sandman
Again, it's the guy that keeps bringing up these decade old lies of yours that is the one that needs to let it go - not the one that never brings it up. That would be me.

Snit
That is dishonest or deceptive at the very best.

Sandman
Incorrect, when I point out your obsession with your exposed lie, a good way to point to it is the numerous times you've created new threads about it without being prompted by me.

Snit
It is certainly not an honest metric.

Sandman
Keep telling yourself that.

Snit
Sandman: deal?

To be clear: you cannot just deny your trolling -- you HAVE to stop and HAVE to remove those pages from your site. ALL of them. NO trolling me on your site. NO trolling me in Usenet. NO trolling me or lying about me anywhere over how much this rips you apart.

Sandman
You're a hoot! You work so hard to fit the Objective Troll Criteria with your every post.

Snit
Will you agree... or not?

Sandman
I can't agree to remove something you have yet to show even exists, now can I? Will you agree to stop hitting your kids?

Snit
To NOT agree means you are going to continue to attribute the words of posts not from "Snit" to me

Sandman
If you post to usenet, and I respond to that post, I will attribute it with your handle. It's just that easy. If you don't want me to attribute your posts to you, then don't post at all. Do we have a deal?

Snit
(which is dishonest of you), you will continue to leave up and maybe even add attacks on your site about me

Sandman
I can not "leave up" something that doesn't exist.

Snit
you will continue to blame ME for your actions of posting that nonsense, etc.

Sandman
I will continue to point out and substantiate the *fact* that the Objective Troll Criteria was requested by you, as well as the Relational Troll Scoring.

This was probably your biggest mistake of all time - ask for substantiation from someone that has the means to provide it in droves, for years and years and years, from someone that could fully document your trolling and visualise it for everyone to see (as if they needed it, but still).

-- Sandman

Snit (1h & 25m) > Sandman