Skip to main content
news

Re: Sandman still lying abo...

GreyCloud
SubjectRe: Sandman still lying about his CSS
FromGreyCloud
Date02/13/2017 06:14 (02/12/2017 22:14)
Message-ID<o7rf84$kqp$5@dont-email.me>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.os.linux.advocacy
FollowsSnit

On 02/12/2017 12:06 PM, Snit wrote:

Snit
On 2/12/17, 11:34 AM, in article o7q9nv$cab$7@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <Cumulus@mist.com>wrote:

GreyCloud
On 02/12/2017 10:04 AM, Snit wrote:

Snit
On 2/12/17, 1:27 AM, in article sandman-620f6112f242e8f570b548ffb7b9c757@individual.net, "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote:

Sandman
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

In article <D4C4F614.8F827%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:

What you had to snip and run from:

Your eleven year long lie has been so run into the ground and your ass has been handed to you so thoroughly that you *can* *not* respond to the facts, only ignore or snip them. That's all you can do.

Here is the link to the WayBackMachine archive of my home page, with heavily edited HTML code by the WBM:

<http://web.archive.org/web/20060519191417/http://www.sandman.net>

Snit
That is your page that was noted to not validate. And it does not.

Sandman
That is not my home page, it can be found here: http://sandman.net

Snit
Invalid CSS shown on sandman.net:

<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

Sandman
That is an archived and heavily edited version of my homepage, to add all sorts of navigation HTML. Validating that page is validating the WayBackMachine's output.

Snit
Invalid CSS shown on sandman.net:

<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

Sandman
In the HTML, there is *one* link to a CSS files:

Snit
Which is NOT your homepage and is NOT the file that was shown in the PDF that showed your CSS to be invalid.

Sandman
As opposed to the heavily edited HTML, the CSS file is more or less intact. Apart from an added comment and edited paths to point to correct resources in the WBM, it's as it is beck when you started to lie about this.

Snit
Invalid CSS shown on sandman.net:

<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

Sandman
When validating the homepage, this is the file that is being validated. And when you run this archived version - that you *just the other day* claimed did not validate - in the validator, it validates perfectly:

Snit
Invalid CSS shown on sandman.net:

<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

Sandman
<https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator? uri=http%3A%2F%2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20060509220758cs_%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fww w.sandman.net%2Fatlas%2Finclude%2Fstyles_plain.php&profile=css3&usermedium=a ll&warning=1&vextwarning=&lang=en>

Snit
Invalid CSS shown on sandman.net:

<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

Sandman
Your exposed lie in video format: <https://vid.me/Povd>

Snit
Invalid CSS shown on sandman.net:

<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

Sandman
<http://web.archive.org/web/20060509220758cs_/http://www.sandman.net/ atlas/include/styles_plain.php>

WBM has added a comment to the top of it, that's all. As opposed to the HTML output, the content remains just as it was back then. And when you run that file in a CSS validator:

Snit
It is YOUR CSS that was not valid

Sandman
Nope:

<https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator? uri=http%3A%2F%2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20060509220758cs_%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fww w.sandman.net%2Fatlas%2Finclude%2Fstyles_plain.php&profile=css3&usermedium=a ll&warning=1&vextwarning=&lang=en>

100% valid.

Snit
Invalid CSS shown on sandman.net:

<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

Sandman
<https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator? uri=http%3A%2F%2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20060509220758cs_%2Fhttp%3A %2F%2Fwww.sandman.net%2Fatlas%2Finclude%2Fstyles_plain.php&profile>>>>>>css3&usermedium=all&warning=1&vextwarning=&lang=en>

Snit
That is not your homepage...

Sandman
That is the CSS of my homepage, which you claimed did not validate:

Snit
And then I proved the CSS of your homepage did not validate.

Invalid CSS shown on sandman.net:

<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

Sandman
<https://vid.me/Povd>

Snit
Invalid CSS shown on sandman.net:

<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

Sandman
It is 100% valid.

Snit
But the page in question is not.

Sandman
That is the file you claimed did not validate: <https://vid.me/Povd>

Snit
Invalid CSS shown on sandman.net:

<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

Sandman
Clearly exposing your eleven year long lie.

Snit
A knee-jerk accusation from you that is contrary to the proof.

Sandman
"Proof" you just can't show.

Snit
Invalid CSS shown on sandman.net:

<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

Sandman
This is a *fact*. A fact that you can't counter, can't respond to, can't meet in any way other than silence.

Snit
Hardly silent... I keep noting your lie!

Sandman
This is the *first* time you have responded to any of it. Of course, you kept lying about it, but kudos for not just snipping and running like a little girl like you usually do.

Snit
Invalid CSS shown on sandman.net:

<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

See, Sandman, when you do not have text to snip and lie about you just ignore it.

Sandman
Ironic, coming from the snipping and running master himself.

Snit
Invalid CSS shown on sandman.net:

<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

Checking now I see the video has quite a few views. Poor Sandman... so many people can see YOUR WORDS which prove you are a liar.

Sandman
<https://vid.me/Povd>

Snit
Invalid CSS shown on sandman.net:

<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

GreyCloud
No he didn't, you lie.

Too much crack, dopey.

Snit
My .sig is right again!

Your .sig is screwed up, just like you.

Guffaw!!!