Google| Subject | Re: Snit Destroys Sandman Part 2 |
| From | GreyCloud |
| Date | 02/13/2017 06:11 (02/12/2017 22:11) |
| Message-ID | <o7rf2e$kqp$2@dont-email.me> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
On 02/12/2017 12:07 PM, Snit wrote:
SnitYour .sig has been huffing too much glue, gluehead.
On 2/12/17, 11:31 AM, in article o7q9hq$cab$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <Cumulus@mist.com>wrote:GreyCloudSnit
On 02/11/2017 02:39 PM, Omar Murad Asfour wrote:Omar Murad AsfourGreyCloud
On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 14:29:49 -0700, Snit wrote:SnitOmar Murad Asfour
On 2/11/17, 12:54 PM, in article sandman-1b53828843596ba07aee958ff4280100@individual.net, "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote:SandmanSnit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
In article <D4C4AFA7.8F79E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:It is 100% valid. Clearly exposing your eleven year long lie. This is a *fact*. A fact that you can't counter, can't respond to, can't meet in any way other than silence.Snit
<https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>Why, Jonas Eklundh, do you make it so easy to point out your lies?Sandman
So do it, point to these supposed lies?
Nothing "supposed" about them: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>
See, when you do not have text to snip to shreds you break down. ...
He's got you Sandman. The jig is up.
Says the nym shifting liar known as snit.
Guffaw!!!
My .sig is right again!
02/08/2017-
