Subject | Re: Sandman still lying about his CSS |
From | Omar Murad Asfour |
Date | 02/11/2017 23:23 (02/11/2017 22:23) |
Message-ID | <o7o2sk$1ub$2@dont-email.me> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Snit (1h & 42m) GreyCloud (20h & 10m) Marek Novotny (20h & 23m) Sandman (1d, 9h & 12m) |
SandmanI see a video from snit. I see nothing but bloviating from you.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
In article <D4C4D05D.8F7E1%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SnitIt is 100% valid. Clearly exposing your eleven year long lie. This is a *fact*. A fact that you can't counter, can't respond to, can't meet in any way other than silence.Snit
<https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>Why, Jonas Eklundh, do you make it so easy to point out your lies?Sandman
So do it, point to these supposed lies?
Nothing "supposed" about them: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>See, when you do not have text to snip to shreds you break down.Sandman
I'm still waiting for you to point to them, Michael. Why just ignore it and avoid it? Because you can't point to it, because it doesn't exist.