Google| Subject | Re: The Show |
| From | Steve Carroll |
| Date | 02/10/2017 19:16 (02/10/2017 10:16) |
| Message-ID | <5cfd6a7e-c369-4b6c-9452-e037595d5865@googlegroups.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Steve Carroll |
| Followups | Marek Novotny (31m) |
On Friday, February 10, 2017 at 10:58:21 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
Steve CarrollEdit: Might help to link to it ;)
On Friday, February 10, 2017 at 10:24:34 AM UTC-7, Marek Novotny wrote:Marek NovotnySteve Carroll
On 2017-02-10, Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>wrote:Steve CarrollMarek Novotny
On Friday, February 10, 2017 at 9:33:32 AM UTC-7, Marek Novotny wrote:Marek NovotnySteve Carroll
Right now I am trying to remember about this Linux friendly mixer which might help me record audio from multiple sources into the mic jack. It was supposed to be very small and I heard it mentioned once on a show. Which I could remember the damn name of it. I'd like to buy that.
All you need is multichannel audio I/O, the 'mixer' can be software based. That said, personally, I prefer to have a physical mixer (you can get units that have multi channel I/O built in). My youngest son and his buddy were messing around with the podcasting idea recently (it was actually video casting against a green screen) and I let them have full reign over my studio (with a cautious eye by me). The results were pretty amazing to me. What can be done out of the house now...
Would you recommend one with the smallest foot-print possible.
I understand the criteria of ' smallest foot-print possible' but that criteria can quickly fall by the wayside once you get things up and running.
<https://www.thepodcasthost.com/equipment/podcast-mixers/>
02/08/2017-
