Google| Subject | Re: Snit Destroys Sandman Part 2 |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 02/12/2017 09:07 (02/12/2017 09:07) |
| Message-ID | <sandman-211b0987e3bc3a214dbec5e0f6bdd32b@individual.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| PGP | Sandman |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Marek Novotny (8h & 30m) Snit (8h & 57m) |
In article <D4C4F4BD.8F821%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:
SnitNo, you explicitly stated that my CSS file didn't validate and you linked to that file. See your lie being ripped to shreds here:
Oh no in the decade+ you have been trolling me over this I have referred to a "CSS file" instead of the "CSS in your files"
<https://vid.me/Povd>
Face it, Sandman, you lied... and for over a decade you have been trolling me over your lie.Number of times we have started new threads about your CSS lie in the last decade:
Sandman: 0 Snit: 40+
That 40 is a really low number since I don't have all the data for the entire decade, I'm afraid
-- Sandman
02/08/2017-
