Skip to main content
news

Re: Sandman still lying abo...

Snit
SubjectRe: Sandman still lying about his CSS
FromSnit
Date02/12/2017 01:10 (02/11/2017 17:10)
Message-ID<D4C4F614.8F827%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.os.linux.advocacy
FollowsSandman
Followupsvallor (38m) > Snit
Sandman (8h & 16m) > Snit

On 2/11/17, 3:21 PM, in article sandman-1941730eff69bb1bd00dad932f04a480@individual.net, "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote:

Sandman
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

In article <D4C4D05D.8F7E1%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:

It is 100% valid. Clearly exposing your eleven year long lie. This is a *fact*. A fact that you can't counter, can't respond to, can't meet in any way other than silence.

Snit
<https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>

Why, Jonas Eklundh, do you make it so easy to point out your lies?

Sandman
So do it, point to these supposed lies?

Snit
Nothing "supposed" about them: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>

See, when you do not have text to snip to shreds you break down.

Sandman
I'm still waiting for you to point to them, Michael.

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

Why just ignore it and avoid it? Because you can't point to it, because it doesn't exist.

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

What you had to snip and run from:

Your eleven year long lie has been so run into the ground and your ass has been handed to you so thoroughly that you *can* *not* respond to the facts, only ignore or snip them. That's all you can do.

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

Here is the link to the WayBackMachine archive of my home page, with heavily edited HTML code by the WBM:

<http://web.archive.org/web/20060519191417/http://www.sandman.net/>

That is your page that was noted to not validate. And it does not.

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

In the HTML, there is *one* link to a CSS files:

Which is NOT your homepage and is NOT the file that was shown in the PDF that showed your CSS to be invalid.

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

<http://web.archive.org/web/20060509220758cs_/http://www.sandman.net/atlas/in clude/styles_plain.php>

WBM has added a comment to the top of it, that's all. As opposed to the HTML output, the content remains just as it was back then. And when you run that file in a CSS validator:

It is YOUR CSS that was not valid:

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

<https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator? uri=http%3A%2F%2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20060509220758cs_%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww sandman.net%2Fatlas%2Finclude%2Fstyles_plain.php&profile=css3&usermedium=all &warning=1&vextwarning=&lang=en>

That is not your homepage... where the invalid CSS was shown.

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

It is 100% valid.

But the page in question is not.

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

Clearly exposing your eleven year long lie.

A knee-jerk accusation from you that is contrary to the proof.

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

This is a *fact*. A fact that you can't counter, can't respond to, can't meet in any way other than silence.

Hardly silent... I keep noting your lie!

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

See, Sandman, when you do not have text to snip and lie about you just ignore it. Ah... poor Sandman.

Checking now I see the video has quite a few views. Poor Sandman... so many people can see YOUR WORDS which prove you are a liar.

-- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

vallor (38m) > Snit
Sandman (8h & 16m) > Snit