Skip to main content
news

Re: Sandman still lying abo...

Snit
SubjectRe: Sandman still lying about his CSS
FromSnit
Date02/12/2017 18:04 (02/12/2017 10:04)
Message-ID<D4C5E398.8F90B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.os.linux.advocacy
FollowsSandman
FollowupsGreyCloud (1h & 30m) > Snit

On 2/12/17, 1:27 AM, in article sandman-620f6112f242e8f570b548ffb7b9c757@individual.net, "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote:

Sandman
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

In article <D4C4F614.8F827%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:

What you had to snip and run from:

Your eleven year long lie has been so run into the ground and your ass has been handed to you so thoroughly that you *can* *not* respond to the facts, only ignore or snip them. That's all you can do.

Here is the link to the WayBackMachine archive of my home page, with heavily edited HTML code by the WBM:

<http://web.archive.org/web/20060519191417/http://www.sandman.net>

Snit
That is your page that was noted to not validate. And it does not.

Sandman
That is not my home page, it can be found here: http://sandman.net

Invalid CSS shown on sandman.net:

<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

That is an archived and heavily edited version of my homepage, to add all sorts of navigation HTML. Validating that page is validating the WayBackMachine's output.

Invalid CSS shown on sandman.net:

<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

In the HTML, there is *one* link to a CSS files:

Snit
Which is NOT your homepage and is NOT the file that was shown in the PDF that showed your CSS to be invalid.

Sandman
As opposed to the heavily edited HTML, the CSS file is more or less intact. Apart from an added comment and edited paths to point to correct resources in the WBM, it's as it is beck when you started to lie about this.

Invalid CSS shown on sandman.net:

<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

When validating the homepage, this is the file that is being validated. And when you run this archived version - that you *just the other day* claimed did not validate - in the validator, it validates perfectly:

Invalid CSS shown on sandman.net:

<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

<https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator? uri=http%3A%2F%2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20060509220758cs_%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fww w.sandman.net%2Fatlas%2Finclude%2Fstyles_plain.php&profile=css3&usermedium=a ll&warning=1&vextwarning=&lang=en>

Invalid CSS shown on sandman.net:

<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

Your exposed lie in video format: <https://vid.me/Povd>

Invalid CSS shown on sandman.net:

<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

<http://web.archive.org/web/20060509220758cs_/http://www.sandman.net/ atlas/include/styles_plain.php>

WBM has added a comment to the top of it, that's all. As opposed to the HTML output, the content remains just as it was back then. And when you run that file in a CSS validator:

Snit
It is YOUR CSS that was not valid

Sandman
Nope:

<https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator? uri=http%3A%2F%2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20060509220758cs_%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fww w.sandman.net%2Fatlas%2Finclude%2Fstyles_plain.php&profile=css3&usermedium=a ll&warning=1&vextwarning=&lang=en>

100% valid.

Invalid CSS shown on sandman.net:

<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

<https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator? uri=http%3A%2F%2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20060509220758cs_%2Fhttp%3A %2F%2Fwww.sandman.net%2Fatlas%2Finclude%2Fstyles_plain.php&profile>>>css3&usermedium=all&warning=1&vextwarning=&lang=en>

Snit
That is not your homepage...

Sandman
That is the CSS of my homepage, which you claimed did not validate:

And then I proved the CSS of your homepage did not validate.

Invalid CSS shown on sandman.net:

<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

<https://vid.me/Povd>

Invalid CSS shown on sandman.net:

<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

It is 100% valid.

Snit
But the page in question is not.

Sandman
That is the file you claimed did not validate: <https://vid.me/Povd>

Invalid CSS shown on sandman.net:

<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

Clearly exposing your eleven year long lie.

Snit
A knee-jerk accusation from you that is contrary to the proof.

Sandman
"Proof" you just can't show.

Invalid CSS shown on sandman.net:

<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

This is a *fact*. A fact that you can't counter, can't respond to, can't meet in any way other than silence.

Snit
Hardly silent... I keep noting your lie!

Sandman
This is the *first* time you have responded to any of it. Of course, you kept lying about it, but kudos for not just snipping and running like a little girl like you usually do.

Invalid CSS shown on sandman.net:

<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

Snit
See, Sandman, when you do not have text to snip and lie about you just ignore it.

Sandman
Ironic, coming from the snipping and running master himself.

Invalid CSS shown on sandman.net:

<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

Snit
Checking now I see the video has quite a few views. Poor Sandman... so many people can see YOUR WORDS which prove you are a liar.

Sandman
<https://vid.me/Povd>

Invalid CSS shown on sandman.net:

<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">

Jonas Eklundh lied: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>. Period.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYoBxVAAoJECFEwfBaA+jR+TkIALOZaARftggUOr9G1HlCTopk SJUkFVvVHUszKutmvIVqpuTh50FmdWXLm6RLhH+Hj+z2qQOaqkUOj66E6RbUKlQ6 CpPiw3bvUvvDSGkUJAfP4So8I8biHpVf9ENf9UqW5q1mbvN51MQcOICr6Es62YFG V1lwzhzWD8ar0uT1Np5pk6Qt2lCSSpkAWuILLbN7oGTvjvvTpRNnsIfCJwGZ9vWW KU/YlTJAec02HMk+3p0aJNoJEw7OaujSXUpUQ2YOpYXHxU39ykRELvcMwPTrqCWG Qmw9Ma7TzxgVtNENWGI7T9IzOXu7PTt6i+MbD/VhfjxbOvBJEzoBbE9jC88Rjb8>=NbIb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

GreyCloud (1h & 30m) > Snit