Subject | Re: Sandman still lying about his CSS |
From | Snit |
Date | 02/11/2017 22:29 (02/11/2017 14:29) |
Message-ID | <D4C4D05D.8F7E1%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Omar Murad Asfour (9m) > Snit Sandman (51m) > Snit GreyCloud (21h) > Snit |
SandmanNothing "supposed" about them: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
In article <D4C4AFA7.8F79E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:It is 100% valid. Clearly exposing your eleven year long lie. This is a *fact*. A fact that you can't counter, can't respond to, can't meet in any way other than silence.Snit
<https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>Why, Jonas Eklundh, do you make it so easy to point out your lies?Sandman
So do it, point to these supposed lies?