Snit
More than a decade later, and in a different group, Sandman is STILL lying about his CSS: On 2/7/17, 11:27 PM, in article sandman-f6d45685d946ef1ca402b3326854b9aa@individual.net, "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote:

<https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator? uri=http%3A%2F%2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20060519191417cs_%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.

s

andman.net%2Fatlas%2Finclude%2Fstyles_plain.php&profile=css3&usermedium=all&wa

r ning=1&vextwarning=&lang=en>

And, lo and behold - it validates perfectly, thus 100% exposing your lie.

I noted was every one of your home pages had CSS that was not valid. You moved goal posts to say that every single CSS file itself had errors. This is a direct lie from you. This PDF gives direct links to the validation of every page: <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/sandman/sandman-css-detail.pdf> You looked at the date shown on page 1. I show the errors you had, but if you do not trust my PDF, click the very top (black) link. <https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http://web.archive.org/we b/20060519191417/http://www.sandman.net/&warning=0&profile=css21&usermedium= all> And, of course, it shows errors in these CSS files: http://web.archive.org/web/20060509220758cs_/http://www.sandman.net/atlas/in clude/styles_plain.php http://web.archive.org/web/20060519191417/http://www.sandman.net/ Once again, Sandman, your lies are trivial to show. I pointed out your CSS had errors.