Subject | Re: Sandman still lying about his CSS |
From | Sandman |
Date | 02/15/2017 23:14 (02/15/2017 23:14) |
Message-ID | <sandman-fab3f7d6715c37a0c063cf8588a60ee5@individual.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
PGP | Sandman |
Follows | Snit |
Followups | Snit (22m) > Sandman |
And I ask again - What accusations?SnitSnitSandman
I just want him to move the hell on. Hey, open deal -- if Sandman stops trolling me and removes all the accusations he has about me from his site
What accusations?
How about the ones posted to your site?
How about the accusations where you attribute the words of names other than "Snit" (me) to me.I only ever attribute posts to you on posts made by you.
How about just stopping ALL that nonsense.What nonsense?
You actually thought I gave a flying shit what you have on your site? That's hilarious.SnitI will remove the PDFs that show his CSS failing from my site.Sandman
Why would I care about what you have on your site?
OK, if you do not care than I will leave them.
I absolutely prefer if you would remove your attacks against me from your siteWhat attacks?
and stop posting them to Usenet.Where did I do that?
There are no "lies" in any of my digests, many of which aren't even about you.SnitIn other words: if Sandman agrees to remove his lies (even if he does not admit they are lies)Sandman
What supposed lies?
All of the "digests" and other nonsense.
Look at ANY of your pages dealing with me.What about them?
40+ threads about your CSS lie from you - 0 from me.SnitI will remove those PDFs from my site.Sandman
I don't give a shit what PDF's you have on your site, Snit. What gave you the idea that I did? That's hilarious!
You have been trolling me over them for more than a decade.
Again, it's the guy that keeps bringing up these decade old lies of yours that is the one that needs to let it go - not the one that never brings it up. That would be me.SnitNot sure if I have any other examples of my "task" to get all the pages... so that task will have to be dropped, too (or I will have to update the software I used to make it). But so be it... I will drop that task if Sandman drops his trolling over his CSS.Sandman
40+ threads about your CSS lies, 0 from me. I wonder who is going to "drop" it, ey? :-D
First: you focus on threads and not posts.
That is dishonest or deceptive at the very best.Incorrect, when I point out your obsession with your exposed lie, a good way to point to it is the numerous times you've created new threads about it without being prompted by me.
It is certainly not an honest metric.Keep telling yourself that.
I can't agree to remove something you have yet to show even exists, now can I? Will you agree to stop hitting your kids?SnitSandman: deal?To be clear: you cannot just deny your trolling -- you HAVE to stop and HAVE to remove those pages from your site. ALL of them. NO trolling me on your site. NO trolling me in Usenet. NO trolling me or lying about me anywhere over how much this rips you apart.Sandman
You're a hoot! You work so hard to fit the Objective Troll Criteria with your every post.
Will you agree... or not?
To NOT agree means you are going to continue to attribute the words of posts not from "Snit" to meIf you post to usenet, and I respond to that post, I will attribute it with your handle. It's just that easy. If you don't want me to attribute your posts to you, then don't post at all. Do we have a deal?
(which is dishonest of you), you will continue to leave up and maybe even add attacks on your site about meI can not "leave up" something that doesn't exist.
you will continue to blame ME for your actions of posting that nonsense, etc.I will continue to point out and substantiate the *fact* that the Objective Troll Criteria was requested by you, as well as the Relational Troll Scoring.