Subject | Re: Sandman still lying about his CSS |
From | Snit |
Date | 02/17/2017 01:17 (02/16/2017 17:17) |
Message-ID | <D4CB8F18.90441%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Sandman |
SandmanResponding with a video to bypass as least some of the lying / trolling games of Sandman (Jonas Eklundh): <https://youtu.be/E3m_i-x92D0>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
In article <D4CB5EBF.903D5%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SandmanSnitSandmanThis post of yours now is logged as "Ignoring 99%" in the snip/ignore statistics of your responses (or lack of responses) to my posts that does not log your trolling: <http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/snitsnip>Steve Carroll
Where is the RTS?
Here: http://usenet.sandman.net/TrollScoring
Let me guess: that was made close to the time I showed your CSS to not pass validation, right?
Not really, here is when you asked me to create the Objective Troll Criteria:
Snit 04/28/2004 08:56:16 PM <BCB54C60.4C654%snit@nospam.cableone.com>
"What is your objective criteria for calling someone a troll?"
This is where you lied about my CSS
Snit 05/31/2006 11:23:14 AM <C0A2AE92.50295%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>
"your CSS does not validate correctly"
And this is where you asked me nicely to show you the network of people that call you a troll, something I called the Relational Troll Scoring.
Snit 07/04/2006 10:05:37 AM <C0CF6F61.53F03%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>
"please support your claims of who does and does not have any network of people calling whoever names..."
Mind you, it was a bit of work, so it wasn't done until later. Google Groups won't let me search for it at the moment, saying a "new version of the application" is needed, telling me to reload, but nothing happens. It's also not in my index any longer I'm afraid. I'll let you know if I find it.