Google| Subject | Re: Sandman still lying about his CSS |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 02/11/2017 20:54 (02/11/2017 20:54) |
| Message-ID | <sandman-1b53828843596ba07aee958ff4280100@individual.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| PGP | Sandman |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Steve Carroll (23m) Snit (1h & 35m) > Sandman Snit (1d, 3h & 46m) |
In article <D4C4AFA7.8F79E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:
SandmanSnit
It is 100% valid. Clearly exposing your eleven year long lie. This is a *fact*. A fact that you can't counter, can't respond to, can't meet in any way other than silence.
<https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>
Why, Jonas Eklundh, do you make it so easy to point out your lies?So do it, point to these supposed lies? Why just ignore it and avoid it? Because you can't point to it, because it doesn't exist.
Your eleven year long lie has been so run into the ground and your ass has been handed to you so thoroughly that you *can* *not* respond to the facts, only ignore or snip them. That's all you can do.
Here is the link to the WayBackMachine archive of my home page, with heavily edited HTML code by the WBM:
<http://web.archive.org/web/20060519191417/http://www.sandman.net/>
In the HTML, there is *one* link to a CSS files:
<http://web.archive.org/web/20060509220758cs_/http://www.sandman.net/atlas/in clude/styles_plain.php>
WBM has added a comment to the top of it, that's all. As opposed to the HTML output, the content remains just as it was back then. And when you run that file in a CSS validator:
<https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator? uri=http%3A%2F%2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20060509220758cs_%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww sandman.net%2Fatlas%2Finclude%2Fstyles_plain.php&profile=css3&usermedium=all &warning=1&vextwarning=&lang=en>
It is 100% valid. Clearly exposing your eleven year long lie. This is a *fact*. A fact that you can't counter, can't respond to, can't meet in any way other than silence.
-- Sandman
02/08/2017-
