Google| Subject | Re: Snit Destroys Sandman Part 2 |
| From | Snit |
| Date | 02/11/2017 22:45 (02/11/2017 14:45) |
| Message-ID | <D4C4D3F8.8F7F9%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Omar Murad Asfour |
| Followups | Steve Carroll (22m) Sandman (43m) > Snit |
On 2/11/17, 2:39 PM, in article o7o0a4$p1c$2@dont-email.me, "Omar Murad Asfour" <omarmasfour@career.net>wrote:
Omar Murad AsfourSandman will pretend he never watched the video. When he responds to the text, if he ever gets the nerve, he will just snip and accuse and lash out.
On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 14:29:49 -0700, Snit wrote:SnitOmar Murad Asfour
On 2/11/17, 12:54 PM, in article sandman-1b53828843596ba07aee958ff4280100@individual.net, "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote:SandmanSnit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
In article <D4C4AFA7.8F79E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:It is 100% valid. Clearly exposing your eleven year long lie. This is a *fact*. A fact that you can't counter, can't respond to, can't meet in any way other than silence.Snit
<https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>Why, Jonas Eklundh, do you make it so easy to point out your lies?Sandman
So do it, point to these supposed lies?
Nothing "supposed" about them: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>
See, when you do not have text to snip to shreds you break down. ...
He's got you Sandman. The jig is up.
He lied. Period. Here is the text writeup Sandman will mangle and try to twist: ----- <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>
Jonas Eklundh (Sandman) had invalid CSS over a decade ago. No big deal to have invalid CSS (at times it absolutely makes sense to have such).
Sandman, though, is incapable of telling the truth. When the error in his CSS was pointed out he fixed it and then denied it. That was absurd, but he has now spent over a decade lying about it and trolling me ever since.
Here is the PDF where his CSS were first pointed out: <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/sandman/sandman-archive.pdf>
This is the CSS validation service showing it being invalid: <https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F% 2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20060519191417%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww. sandman.net%2F&profile=css3&usermedium=all&warning=1&vextwarning=& lang=en>OR <https://goo.gl/wQ6bWY>
Jonas Eklundh's current game is to COMPLETELY ignore the the topic (his home page failing CSS validation) and instead he looks at the validation information for a CSS page tied to his home page but which was never mentioned or referenced in the PDF that proved his CSS failed validation.
Jonas Eklundh is being grossly dishonest here. Even on seeing this proof of his lies he just ignores it and repeats the SAME lies:
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy /rhLhQcRhZnE/47ZFe3y0CQAJ>OR <https://goo.gl/x3ke7A>
As noted in the video, Jonas Eklundh responds to text by snipping dishonestly and calling everything a lie. His response this video -- 100% unimpeachable proof if his lies -- is to just pretend the proof does not exist. -----
And keep in mind Sandman's CSS lie is THE LIE that got him to frenzy over a decade ago. And he has not stopped yet!
-- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
02/08/2017-
