Subject | Re: Sandman still lying about his CSS |
From | Steve Carroll |
Date | 02/11/2017 21:17 (02/11/2017 12:17) |
Message-ID | <241d0299-a0a2-4529-874a-c875f2a816ed@googlegroups.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Sandman |
SandmanI recall, in CSMA, where you acknowledged issues you had, in fact, I'm pretty sure I even commented. Frankly, I don't see what his beef is, if you had errors... BFD. He's sure quiet on the (mis)use of CSS that let's one build a site like his! It's clear he'd rather bitch about you (or any other bizarre thing he can drum up on usenet) than fix his business site. WTF?!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In article <D4C4AFA7.8F79E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SandmanIt is 100% valid. Clearly exposing your eleven year long lie. This is a *fact*. A fact that you can't counter, can't respond to, can't meet in any way other than silence.Snit
<https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o> Why, Jonas Eklundh, do you make it so easy to point out your lies?
So do it, point to these supposed lies?