Google| Subject | Re: Sandman still lying about his CSS |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 02/13/2017 08:23 (02/13/2017 08:23) |
| Message-ID | <sandman-43ab5d360e4bcd0ccf757163a3723758@individual.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| PGP | Sandman |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | chrisv (6h & 46m) Snit (8h & 33m) > Sandman |
In article <D4C640A1.8FA55%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:
Snit
On 2/11/17, 3:21 PM, in article sandman-1941730eff69bb1bd00dad932f04a480@individual.net, "Sandman"
SandmanSnit
<http://web.archive.org/web/20060519191417/http://www.sandman.net>
And on that page we see YOUR code:
<div style="padding: 3px; align: center;">
Do you, Jonas Eklundh, understand why that is invalid CSS?Snip and run, it's all you can do. Here is your claim again, the one you keep snipping and running from:
Snit Sandman still lying about his CSS 02/08/2017 <D4C09A90.8F165%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
"And, of course, it shows errors in these CSS files:
http://web.archive.org/web/20060509220758cs_/http://www.sandman.net/ atlas/include/styles_plain.php"
Which of course is a lie. You can only find errors in the by-WayBackMachine- edited HTML code. Nor can you find errors from the WBM that is relevant to the date on which you started your lie.
Remember, I have no "pride" invested in my CSS. You claimed it didn't validate, I checked it and it validated. You have since then admitted that you validated it using an older CSS standard, further showcasing your dishonesty.
-- Sandman
02/08/2017-
