Subject | Re: Sandman still lying about his CSS |
From | Sandman |
Date | 02/08/2017 19:47 (02/08/2017 19:47) |
Message-ID | <sandman-2f1c70b1e785f99110c01eda066c5c14@individual.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
PGP | gpg: Signature made Wed Feb 8 19:47:46 2017 CET
gpg: using RSA key 2144C1F05A03E8D1
gpg: BAD signature from "Sandman |
Follows | Snit |
Followups | Snit (4m) > Sandman |
SnitLie #1 - you lied about my CSS not validating almost *ELEVEN YEARS AGO* and here you are dragging it up again and again, making sure you match the OTC at every turn.
I noted was every one of your home pages had CSS that was not valid.
You moved goal posts to say that every single CSS file itself had errors.Lie #2, I correctly pointed out that your "support" is invalid, given the fact that the CSS validates perfectly, like it did when you made the lie in the first place.
This PDF gives direct links to the validation of every page:..of the HTML presented by the WayBackMachine, not the HTML as it was on my homepage *ELEVEN YEARS AGO*.
You looked at the date shown on page 1. I show the errors you had, but if you do not trust my PDF, click the very top (black) link.
<https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http://web.archive.org/we b/20060519191417/http://www.sandman.net/&warning=0&profile=css21&usermediumall>
And, of course, it shows errors in these CSS files:
http://web.archive.org/web/20060509220758cs_/http://www.sandman.net/atlas/in clude/styles_plain.phpLie #3 - No, it doesn't:
Once again, Sandman, your lies are trivial to show.Yet you are totally unable to do so, how come? For *ELEVEN YEARS* have you lied about this, for *ELEVEN YEARS*. That's freaking amazing.