Google| Subject | Re: Sandman still lying about his CSS |
| From | GreyCloud |
| Date | 02/13/2017 06:15 (02/12/2017 22:15) |
| Message-ID | <o7rf9g$kqp$6@dont-email.me> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
On 02/12/2017 12:07 PM, Snit wrote:
SnitYour .sig only says that there will be crickets chirping and that you ran away and cannot prove a thing.
On 2/12/17, 11:30 AM, in article o7q9gq$cab$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <Cumulus@mist.com>wrote:GreyCloudSnit
On 02/11/2017 02:29 PM, Snit wrote:SnitGreyCloud
On 2/11/17, 12:54 PM, in article sandman-1b53828843596ba07aee958ff4280100@individual.net, "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote:SandmanSnit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
In article <D4C4AFA7.8F79E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:It is 100% valid. Clearly exposing your eleven year long lie. This is a *fact*. A fact that you can't counter, can't respond to, can't meet in any way other than silence.Snit
<https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>Why, Jonas Eklundh, do you make it so easy to point out your lies?Sandman
So do it, point to these supposed lies?
Nothing "supposed" about them: <https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>
See, when you do not have text to snip to shreds you break down. ...
So show his lies then. You can't because you run from your own lies. LOL!!!
My .sig is right again!
Guffaw!!!
02/08/2017-
