Subject | Re: Sandman still lying about his CSS |
From | Steve Carroll |
Date | 02/16/2017 21:48 (02/16/2017 12:48) |
Message-ID | <1a6d6278-eb97-4f2a-8948-947351e9eacf@googlegroups.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (46m) > Steve Carroll |
SandmanI just don't recall seeing that before... pretty cool stuff in there (I saw the RTS is still working since you fixed it).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In article <62394d0b-ca09-4fde-b564-bfe48d87fa56@googlegroups.com>, Steve Carroll wrote:SandmanHOLY LORAZAPAM, BATMAN! That "Reader" section is insane ;)This post of yours now is logged as "Ignoring 99%" in the snip/ignore statistics of your responses (or lack of responses) to my posts that does not log your trolling:<http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/snitsnip>Steve Carroll
Where is the RTS? I like these keyword references: <http://usenet.sandman.net/Quotes.php?keyword=ironic>You should make it like tag clouds, where they get bigger when there are more refs. Then again, Snit's refs might not leave room for any others... or the content, for that matter ;)
What do you mean?