Subject | Sandman -- you never answered these questions! |
From | Snit |
Date | 02/15/2017 21:30 (02/15/2017 13:30) |
Message-ID | <D4CA087E.9015A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Snit |
SnitYou never said if you would stop this!
On 2/15/17, 12:49 PM, in article sandman-8fba4866badd3fe87c0bb6c7389fe289@individual.net, "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote:SandmanSnit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
In article <D4C9EE03.900FC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SnitSandman
I just want him to move the hell on. Hey, open deal -- if Sandman stops trolling me and removes all the accusations he has about me from his site
What accusations?
How about the ones posted to your site? How about the accusations where you attribute the words of names other than "Snit" (me) to me. How about just stopping ALL that nonsense.
You never said if you would. You have hinted you think I asked you to post them. Whatever. I want them ALL removed.SnitI will remove the PDFs that show his CSS failing from my site.Sandman
Why would I care about what you have on your site?
OK, if you do not care than I will leave them. I absolutely prefer if you would remove your attacks against me from your site and stop posting them to Usenet.
You also do not answer this question.SnitTo be clear: you cannot just deny your trolling -- you HAVE to stop and HAVE to remove those pages from your site. ALL of them. NO trolling me on your site. NO trolling me in Usenet. NO trolling me or lying about me anywhere over how much this rips you apart.Sandman
You're a hoot! You work so hard to fit the Objective Troll Criteria with your every post.
Will you agree... or not?
To NOT agree means you are going to continue to attribute the words of posts not from "Snit" to me (which is dishonest of you), you will continue to leave up and maybe even add attacks on your site about me, you will continue to blame ME for your actions of posting that nonsense, etc.-- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.