Sandman
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

In article <D4C09A90.8F165%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:

Snit
I noted was every one of your home pages had CSS that was not valid.

Sandman
Lie #1 - you lied about my CSS not validating almost *ELEVEN YEARS AGO* and here you are dragging it up again and again, making sure you match the OTC at every turn.

Also, I only have one homepage.

Snit
You moved goal posts to say that every single CSS file itself had errors.

Sandman
Lie #2, I correctly pointed out that your "support" is invalid, given the fact that the CSS validates perfectly, like it did when you made the lie in the first place.

Snit
This PDF gives direct links to the validation of every page:

Sandman
..of the HTML presented by the WayBackMachine, not the HTML as it was on my homepage

*ELEVEN YEARS AGO*.

Here is a link to the *CSS* validating for my page on one of the dates you have used as "support" (which of course is *NOT* the date your claim is relevant to);

<https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator? uri=http%3A%2F%2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20060519191417cs_%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww. sandman.n et%2Fatlas%2Finclude%2Fstyles_plain.php&profile=css3&usermedium=all&warning=1& vextwarni ng=&lang=en>

That's for the date 2006-05-19, your claim was made on 2006-05-31

Snit
You looked at the date shown on page 1. I show the errors you had, but if you do not trust my PDF, click the very top (black) link.

<https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http://web.archive.org/we b/20060519191417/http://www.sandman.net/&warning=0&profile=css21&usermediumal l>

And, of course, it shows errors in these CSS files:

http://web.archive.org/web/20060509220758cs_/http://www.sandman.net/atlas/in clude/styles_plain.php

Sandman
Lie #3 - No, it doesn't:

<https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator? uri=http%3A%2F%2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20060509220758cs_%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww. sandman.n et%2Fatlas%2Finclude%2Fstyles_plain.php&profile=css3&usermedium=all&warning=1& vextwarni ng=&lang=en>

That's the CSS validator checking *that exact URL* that you *just now* again *incorrectly* claimed doesn't validate.

Snit
Once again, Sandman, your lies are trivial to show.

Sandman
Yet you are totally unable to do so, how come? For *ELEVEN YEARS* have you lied about this, for *ELEVEN YEARS*. That's freaking amazing.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYm2fSAAoJECFEwfBaA+jRuu8H/RP5AqxVy+ic42aCg10x5MdO fvI3Q9XQIS5UebFsnbq/AvKl0Nmfj/2q3lRRjgufcaWiBgK7OBgvof1G3RRng7Ab yqQgsDNRgjfLzt0DTpKOaCBvYQQ52piUPB2Uo0LLrFostvUdH1bGajh6MMgISytK LTJAsQRq/ITzffmDuzyf4Cak+o9JqadxlJVguqO4xbTIHA6w9I0sh7BMC/CrFyRP jbo1FUhOPtCwdgkxxsEKYjf/vMFaGxAEKosQ77WTr37CSpNKDHch58fotwUQbFjr B+y1UupGdocvzBdZYCGN0WUCeMuw+NM+1npaP2nZPUthFpDsGDaeC8SqSxswtK0>=O2Xt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----