Google| Subject | Sandman still lying about his CSS |
| From | Snit |
| Date | 02/08/2017 17:51 (02/08/2017 09:51) |
| Message-ID | <D4C09A90.8F165%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Followups | Steve Carroll (19m) Snit (53m) Sandman (1h & 56m) > Snit |
More than a decade later, and in a different group, Sandman is STILL lying about his CSS:
On 2/7/17, 11:27 PM, in article sandman-f6d45685d946ef1ca402b3326854b9aa@individual.net, "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote:
<https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator? uri=http%3A%2F%2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20060519191417cs_%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.I noted was every one of your home pages had CSS that was not valid. You moved goal posts to say that every single CSS file itself had errors. This is a direct lie from you.sandman.net%2Fatlas%2Finclude%2Fstyles_plain.php&profile=css3&usermedium=all&war ning=1&vextwarning=&lang=en>And, lo and behold - it validates perfectly, thus 100% exposing your lie.
This PDF gives direct links to the validation of every page: <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/sandman/sandman-css-detail.pdf>
You looked at the date shown on page 1. I show the errors you had, but if you do not trust my PDF, click the very top (black) link.
<https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http://web.archive.org/we b/20060519191417/http://www.sandman.net/&warning=0&profile=css21&usermediumall>
And, of course, it shows errors in these CSS files:
http://web.archive.org/web/20060509220758cs_/http://www.sandman.net/atlas/in clude/styles_plain.php
http://web.archive.org/web/20060519191417/http://www.sandman.net/
Once again, Sandman, your lies are trivial to show. I pointed out your CSS had errors. You fixed it and then your ego got in your way and you felt you had to deny it. You lied. And here you are, over a decade later, STILL lying about it.
You cannot stop yourself from lying.
-- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
02/08/2017-
