Google| Subject | Re: Sandman still lying about his CSS |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 02/09/2017 07:40 (02/09/2017 07:40) |
| Message-ID | <sandman-c220dbec1eeb0406f19dbd73b3ebdde0@individual.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| PGP | Sandman |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Snit (2d, 9h & 56m) > Sandman |
In article <D4C0C490.8F1DC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:
I'm not the one that have been dragging this topic up again and again for eleven years, Snit. That would be you. I'm just exposing your lies when you do it.SandmanSnit
Validation is of little concern to me, never has been.
Yet you have been freaking out over it for a decade.
Here is the link to the WayBackMachine archive of my home page, with heavily edited HTML code by the WBM:
<http://web.archive.org/web/20060519191417/http://www.sandman.net/>
In the HTML, there is *one* link to a CSS files:
<http://web.archive.org/web/20060509220758cs_/http://www.sandman.net/atlas/in clude/styles_plain.php>
WBM has added a comment to the top of it, that's all. As opposed to the HTML output, the content remains just as it was back then. And when you run that file in a CSS validator:
<https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator? uri=http%3A%2F%2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20060509220758cs_%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww sandman.net%2Fatlas%2Finclude%2Fstyles_plain.php&profile=css3&usermedium=all &warning=1&vextwarning=&lang=en>
It is 100% valid. Clearly exposing your eleven year long lie. This is a *fact*. A fact that you can't counter, can't respond to, can't meet in any way other than silence.
-- Sandman
02/08/2017-
