Snit
On 2/8/17, 9:51 AM, in article D4C09A90.8F165%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com, "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:

More than a decade later, and in a different group, Sandman is STILL lying about his CSS:

On 2/7/17, 11:27 PM, in article sandman-f6d45685d946ef1ca402b3326854b9aa@individual.net, "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote:

<https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?

uri=http%3A%2F%2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20060519191417cs_%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww>> .

s

andman.net%2Fatlas%2Finclude%2Fstyles_plain.php&profile=css3&usermedium=all&w>> a

r ning=1&vextwarning=&lang=en>

And, lo and behold - it validates perfectly, thus 100% exposing your lie.

I noted was every one of your home pages had CSS that was not valid. You moved goal posts to say that every single CSS file itself had errors. This is a direct lie from you.

This PDF gives direct links to the validation of every page: <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/sandman/sandman-css-detail.pdf>

You looked at the date shown on page 1. I show the errors you had, but if you do not trust my PDF, click the very top (black) link.

<https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http://web.archive.org/we b/20060519191417/http://www.sandman.net/&warning=0&profile=css21&usermedium>>all>

And, of course, it shows errors in these CSS files:

http://web.archive.org/web/20060509220758cs_/http://www.sandman.net/atlas/in clude/styles_plain.php

http://web.archive.org/web/20060519191417/http://www.sandman.net/

Once again, Sandman, your lies are trivial to show. I pointed out your CSS had errors. You fixed it and then your ego got in your way and you felt you had to deny it. You lied. And here you are, over a decade later, STILL lying about it.

You cannot stop yourself from lying.

Looking at the errors you had...