Snit
On 2/11/17, 12:38 PM, in article eg97i1F4vtkU3@mid.individual.net, "vallor" <vallor@cultnix.org>wrote:

...

<https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>

Why, Jonas Eklundh, do you make it so easy to point out your lies?

...

vallor
And with that, "Snit" surrenders.

Snit
Well, there is no challenge to pointing out Jonas Eklundh's lies, and no chance of him ever admitting to them. But trivial to show (and note all Sandman can do is pretend the proof does not exist):

<https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o>

Jonas Eklundh (Sandman) had invalid CSS over a decade ago. No big deal to have invalid CSS (at times it absolutely makes sense to have such).

Sandman, though, is incapable of telling the truth. When the error in his CSS was pointed out he fixed it and then denied it. That was absurd, but he has now spent over a decade lying about it and trolling me ever since.

Here is the PDF where his CSS were first pointed out: <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/sandman/sandman-archive.pdf>

This is the CSS validation service showing it being invalid: <https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%

org%2Fweb%2F20060519191417%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.sandman.net%

ermedium=all&warning=1&vextwarning=&lang=en>OR <https://goo.gl/wQ6bWY>

Jonas Eklundh's current game is to COMPLETELY ignore the the topic (his home page failing CSS validation) and instead he looks at the validation information for a CSS page tied to his home page but which was never mentioned or referenced in the PDF that proved his CSS failed validation.

Jonas Eklundh is being grossly dishonest here. Even on seeing this proof of his lies he just ignores it and repeats the SAME lies:

<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/

nE/47ZFe3y0CQAJ>OR <https://goo.gl/x3ke7A>

As noted in the video, Jonas Eklundh responds to text by snipping dishonestly and calling everything a lie. His response this video -- 100% unimpeachable proof if his lies -- is to just pretend the proof does not exist.