Google| Subject | Re: Snit Destroys Sandman Part 2 |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 02/11/2017 23:28 (02/11/2017 23:28) |
| Message-ID | <sandman-56cde5945f6fbc66e79b1798b1b57611@individual.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| PGP | gpg: Signature made Sat Feb 11 23:28:54 2017 CET
gpg: using RSA key 2144C1F05A03E8D1
gpg: BAD signature from "Sandman |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Snit (1h & 36m) > Sandman |
In article <D4C4D3F8.8F7F9%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:
SnitThat is the CSS validation service showing the HTML presented by the WayBackMachine being invalid, as I've told you many times. You know, the part you keep snipping and running from.
This is the CSS validation service showing it being invalid: <https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F% 2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20060519191417%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww. sandman.net%2F&profile=css3&usermedium=all&warning=1&vextwarning=& lang=en>OR <https://goo.gl/wQ6bWY>
When you look at the CSS independent of the WBM HTML, you get this:
<https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator? uri=http%3A%2F%2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20060509220758cs_%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww sandman.net%2Fatlas%2Finclude%2Fstyles_plain.php&profile=css3&usermedium=all &warning=1&vextwarning=&lang=en>
Ass handed, yet again. Now watch Snit snip and run :)
Oh, and here's a video for you:
<https://vid.me/Povd>
Ooops, your lie exposed in video format as well! Eleven years and you still lie about it. That's pretty amazing!
-- Sandman
02/08/2017-
